Why is 'pants' plural?

Well the logical explanation would be that a pant is a leg of the pants or something. Yeah, that makes sense. A pair of pants isn’t two pants, but instead.. one pants (huh?).

Someone has to fill me in on this one. Pleaaaase.


5 thoughts on “Why is 'pants' plural?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: